2014 could be another good year for equities
2014 could be another good year for equities
Global stock markets had another stellar year in 2013 as the S&P 500 Index notched record after record. Investors are likely to remain well disposed to equities in 2014 due to the same underlying reason – the prospect of sustained economic progress in the US.
Indeed, the US economy is as healthy as it has been in the past 20 years thanks to the structural improvements in its fiscal and trade deficits. In 2009, the US fiscal deficit was 10% of GDP, or about US$1.5 trillion (A$1.7 trillion). By 2015, this shortfall is forecast to be only 3% of GDP, which is comparable to trend GDP growth and allows the US to stabilise its debt levels. For the first time in 30 years, the trade position has improved during a time of economic growth and the reason for that is shale energy. These narrowing deficits have helped to stabilise the US dollar, which is one of the reasons commodity prices and some emerging markets have been under pressure.
The rally in the US stock market has helped restore the confidence and net worth of consumers. One important point to recognise about the US stock market is that it is a source of economic strength as well as an outcome of it. A hefty chunk of US wealth is invested in the stock market and, despite wealth inequalities, a rising stock market helps the economy. We now have the prospect of the US economy growing at a sustainable 3% real rate in a low-inflation environment, which means the Federal Reserve can afford to prune, or taper, its asset buying. This is a broadly supportive environment for developed world equity markets.
A further rerating of equities is possible but there is less potential for earnings growth to take stock prices higher. The US is the place likely to deliver the best earnings growth, but generally stock prices will rise faster than profits. It follows that valuations would move higher and investors should be aware that there is some risk that equities could become expensive and prompt corrections.
Worrying Europe
While investors can expect the US economy to expand, nominal economic growth will remain low. As inflation is generally tame across major economic areas, the logic for tighter monetary policy is simply not there. Discussions about the rapid normalisation of rates appear overdone. Real interest rates are likely to remain negative for some time given the debt dynamics of developed economies. Public debt levels today are higher than they were in 2008 due to the transfer of debt from the private to the public sector.
Despite the pressing need, the tapering or the unwinding of quantitative-easing support will be a focus in 2014. Once tapering begins in the US, it will present a bigger challenge to Europe than it does to the US because of the deflationary dynamics in Europe. Given that the US labour force participation rate is historically low – having fallen to a 35-year low in 2013 – and real incomes are not growing in the US, there is little to prompt the Fed to taper. It would be best to see 3% growth and material improvements in employment before tapering begins.
Although we’ve seen some incipient signs of recovery in Europe, this should be viewed as a statistical event coming off extremely low levels of growth. There is little inventory in Europe, so even a slight shift in demand affects industrial production and growth. A modest cyclical improvement should not be confused with a structural recovery, as the preconditions are not yet in place for the latter to occur.
This broader structural adjustment process is expected to persist for another two or three years. While there has been some progress, such as with unit labour costs in the peripheral countries, it has come with high social costs and there is still the risk that Europe faces a deflationary future given government policies. An inflation rate of close to 0% is not inconceivable next year. Nominal economic growth could thus amount to around 1%. Given that 10-year government bonds are in the region of 4.1% in countries such as Italy, the debt problem is worsening. Countries need primary surpluses just to even out the compounding interest effects. This makes it hard for Europe to grow out of its debt problems. Investors can expect some form of debt default (via rescheduling or restructuring) sooner or later in the eurozone. The key weakness for Europe’s equity market remains an undercapitalised banking system exposed to peripheral sovereign debt risk. Our research shows that while the strong banks have become healthier, the weak banks are in worse shape.
The improvement in European equity markets seen thus far has been largely driven by rebounding or economically sensitive areas with low returns on equity such as Greek banks. This is not the kind of rally to get excited about. The euro at its current level also represents something of a headwind to further progress. Valuations remain attractive, however, and half of the stocks in the European market have a dividend yield above the yield on credit, where yields are close to historic lows.
The better placed
In Japan, investors are waiting for evidence of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s commitment to his third arrow of structural reform. The equity market in Japan tends to be policy driven. The first two arrows of Abe’s radical economic program – fiscal spending and monetary stimulus – should lead to faster in GDP growth in the next 12 months. Against this backdrop, there is room for Japanese equities to move higher. But whether this rally will turn into a multi-year bull market is another matter. Delivering on the third arrow is the key and this requires some bold policy adjustments. Japan’s long-term real growth rate will not increase unless the workforce expands or productivity improves. There are two routes to boosting the workforce; increasing female participation rates, or immigration; the latter is an unlikely option.
The stable-to-stronger US dollar is putting downward pressure on commodity prices and, by extension, some emerging markets. Emerging markets now require a more nuanced strategy that recognises the divergent drivers within the emerging world. From 2003 to 2007, the rising tide of China and the weaker US dollar/strong commodity prices lifted many emerging countries. We are in a different environment now where the underlying heterogeneity of emerging markets has reasserted itself. Some markets will stumble, some will thrive.
In my view, emerging markets must turn away from export-led economic models and embrace structural reform. Those that do, such as China, should do well while those that do not may face headwinds. It is clear that emerging markets can no longer rely on the benefits of a weak US dollar and elevated commodity prices.
In terms of risks, the evolution of the credit cycle in China is a worry given the lack of transparency surrounding the country’s financial system. It’s clear that credit creation in China has outpaced economic growth for some time and the country’s debt is now equal to about 200% of GDP. In a country that does not have mature western-style financial markets, the extent of the debt compared with the size and experience of the financial system is a concern. The question is how a country like this could deal with deleveraging. Ultimately, investors can expect a lower rate of economic growth in China due to these challenges.
Over the past decade, commodity-producing nations prospered and investors rerated sectors and stocks connected to hard assets such as metal miners and steel companies. At the same time, intangible assets were devalued. It’s likely that we will see a rerating of companies with intellectual property in healthcare, technology and finance. These sectors are the ones that will lead stock markets.
Within pharmaceuticals, for example, we are on the verge of major therapeutic breakthroughs in areas such as oncology. In IT, internet companies remain innovative and valuations look cheap. The telecoms sector looks likely to be the beneficiary of M&A activity, especially in Europe, where regulators may take a positive view of any consolidation that increases capital investment. Lastly, while regulatory pressures plague financial services, there is scope for valuations to re-rate from low levels over the next few years.
We thank Fidelity for this article
The information contained in this newsletter is of a general nature only and does not take into account your particular objectives, financial situation or needs. Accordingly the information should not be used, relied upon or treated as a substitute for specific financial advice. Whilst all care has been taken in the preparation of this material, no warranty is given in respect of the information provided. Taurus Financial Services Pty Ltd its directors or staff, nor its employees or agents shall be liable on any ground whatsoever with respect to decisions or actions taken as a result of you acting upon such information.
Taurus Financial Services Pty Ltd is an Authorised Representative of SECURITOR Financial Group and provides Financial Planning Services in respect of Shares, Managed Investments, Superannuation and Personal Risk Insurance. SECURITOR is only responsible for the services provided by your Adviser through Taurus Financial Services Pty Ltd. You may also receive services from Taurus Mortgage Services Pty Ltd for Mortgage Origination and Debt Re-Financing, and from Taurus Professional Services Pty Ltd in respect of Banking facilities, Taxation, Estate Planning and Migration Services. Taurus Accounting Services Pty Ltd in respect of Accounting and Taxation Services. Taurus Business Partners in respect of Accounting and Taxation Services. Taurus Migration Consultants Pty Ltd in respect of Migration Services and Hatch & Associates Pty Ltd in respect of Legal Services including Estate Planning and Conveyancing. SECURITOR is not responsible for advice provided by your Adviser through Taurus Mortgage Services Pty Ltd, Taurus Professional Services Pty Ltd, Taurus Accounting Services Pty Ltd, Taurus Business Partners, Taurus Migration Consultants Pty Ltd, Hatch & Associates Pty Ltd or any other company.